Share 
This image was created entirely by AI with guidance from our editorial team.
Bonus TL;DR
- Analyst Kyle Hunter questioned DraftKings Predict pricing on the 2026 midterms, arguing Democratic odds are undervalued in key House and Senate races.
- Hunter identified Sherrod Brown’s Ohio Senate contract at 64% as underpriced relative to candidate quality and historical state performance.
Political prediction market analyst Kyle Hunter questioned DraftKings Predict’s pricing on several 2026 midterm election outcomes in an Action Network episode published Oct. 19.
Speaking with host Mike Calabrese, Hunter argued that some contracts undervalued Democratic prospects, particularly in the House and Ohio Senate race. Those assessments were his trading opinions, not established probabilities or election results.
The episode of Predicting Politics, presented by DraftKings, discussed DraftKings Predict, Kalshi, and Polymarket. Its central theme was comparing market prices with polling and candidate-specific factors rather than treating an election favorite as automatically worth backing.
Hunter Questions House and Ohio Senate Prices
Hunter said the party in power is usually unpopular during midterms and argued that Republicans face pressure this cycle. He described the House as an easier path for Democrats than the Senate.
“I think the blue wave is going to be real when it comes to the House,” Hunter said.
He also argued that a DraftKings Predict contract on Republicans not sweeping both chambers was priced too low. The supplied source does not give a specific price for that contract.
In Ohio, Hunter pointed to Sherrod Brown’s history of outperforming other Democrats as a reason to question the market’s assessment of his Senate contest against John Husted. The discussion cited a 64% price for Brown’s “yes” contract on DraftKings Predict, while Hunter said his own assessment was above 70%.
Those figures describe pricing and opinion discussed in the episode, not a verified current quote. Hunter’s broader argument was that candidate quality can matter even in states that favor the opposing party.
Texas Races Illustrate Limits of Party-Based Forecasts
Hunter favored Greg Abbott in the Texas governor’s race against Gina Hinojosa, saying Abbott was more popular than Ken Paxton, whom the episode identified as the Republican Senate candidate.
He suggested that split-ticket voting could produce different outcomes in the two contests. Hunter also argued that the Libertarian Senate candidate could draw more support from the Republican candidate, and identified the Hispanic vote as a factor to watch in both races.
The discussion returned to price comparison as a central trading consideration.
“Price shopping is really important,” Hunter said, discussing differences between “yes” and “no” contract prices.
He also cautioned that people often bet on outcomes they want to happen, which can lead to mistakes, and said he likes election-night live trading. The episode did not establish new platform availability, eligibility rules, or a product launch timeline.
Source: As reported by The Action Network: Sports Betting Picks & Tips.
