Share 
Bonus TL;DR
- A federal jury in Virginia recently awarded one hundred fifty thousand dollars to a local police officer for defamation.
- The civil litigation followed false social media statements made after a patron dispute at a regional retail casino.
A federal jury in Abingdon awarded $150,000 to Bristol, Virginia, police officer Lily-Kay Tomlinson after finding that Stephanie Williams-Bates knowingly made defamatory statements about her on social media following an incident at Hard Rock Casino Bristol.
The verdict, reported by WCYB on Sept. 30, ties a civil defamation ruling to a confrontation that began at the Virginia casino property in September 2025. For gambling-industry readers, the case is notable because the underlying dispute arose at a major regional casino, even though the lawsuit itself centered on posts made after the encounter rather than on physical operations or a regulated online casino product framework.
Verdict follows dispute over casino encounter
According to WCYB, Williams-Bates claimed she was assaulted and injured by Tomlinson after the officer approached her in an exclusive lounge at Hard Rock Casino Bristol.
Body camera footage released by the Bristol Virginia Police Department showed Williams-Bates shouting and using profanity before Tomlinson is seen grabbing her arm, according to the report.
Williams-Bates maintained in court that she was injured during the encounter. But medical records presented at trial showed no acute findings, WCYB reported.
The jury deliberated for less than 20 minutes before returning its verdict in favor of Tomlinson.
What the ruling does and does not resolve
The jury’s award resolves the civil defamation claim described in the report, with damages set at $150,000. The available source summary does not specify the exact statements posted on social media, the full court procedural history, or whether an appeal was announced.
It also does not indicate any action against Hard Rock Casino Bristol or suggest that the casino itself was a defendant in the case. Based on the reported facts, the property’s role was as the location where the September 2025 encounter began.
That makes this a casino-connected legal story rather than an operator enforcement action. Still, it is a reminder that incidents occurring on gaming property can lead to litigation that extends well beyond the original event, especially when allegations are later amplified on social media.
Source: As reported by WCYB.
